Despite the lack of response to my emails, the thieving schmuck actually took down our work. I wonder whose work it is he’s lifted this time…
That use of “whose” doesn’t look right to me. Is that right? Who’s? Whose?
Damn. 
Of course, none of our clients would ever want this… 
archives • blog • about • photos · contact · goodies • The Moxie Girls™ • blogging with moxie
© 2003-2007 Tenth-Muse.com (We have lawyers.) • Illustration created for The Moxie Girls™ by Derek Yaniger. (So does he.)
couture blog design by 
Moxie Design Studios™ • HM is my co-pilot. • Expression Engine means go!
from Houston • Cocktail: Mango Mojito
No, you used it correctly.
“Who’s” is the contraction. Who is, who was, blah.
“Whose” is possessive cos the bastard apostrophe was already used before.
from Houston • Cocktail: Mango Mojito
Here’s one of the sites he’s claiming. I clicked on the “designed by” link at the bottom but the page was unavailable. I seriously doubt it’s his anyway. None of the photos n’ such come over when you click for examples. He’s probably hotlinking. What a putz.
from Crazy, USA
Schmuck is too nice a word.
Don’t know whose designs those are, but all the images in the templates source to:
file:///D|/28 PLANTILLAS PROFESIONAL/BA_TRAVELPARADISE/TTRAVELPARADISE/images
Duh.